![]() |
The 1-Notrump Opening Bid |
This is my favorite system — partly because I get to revel in the opponents' bewilderment when they learn that we do not play Stayman, and partly because of the opening leader's frustration at having little clue as to declarer's distribution even after a major-suit inquiry, but mostly because this simply is the most powerful notrump setup in use today.
Although this system was conceived for a strong-notrump range (15+), we use it with our weak notrump openings as well. In these cases, the meanings of just two bids are swapped in the interests of right-siding the play.
The plethora of charts might be imposing, but some study will reveal a number of underlying patterns and parallel structures that facilitate assimilation of the methods. The Responder's Map has been created for that purpose. Admittedly, becoming comfortable with the structure will take some time; I kept my own notes handy for months!
Advantages
- concealment of opener's distribution unless a fit is found.
- precise identification of responder's patterns.
- can play in two diamonds.
- avoid bad notrump games with weak major-suit combinations.
- find 4-3 major fits when appropriate.
- step responses accept or decline games or slams.
Disadvantages
- potentially wrong-sides some 4-4 spade contracts when responder has both majors.
- game invitations cannot be played below 2
. (Of course, most other modern systems cannot do that either, except with some 5-4 in the majors.)
Other
- when responder is unbalanced, 5-2 major fits will be played in 3M rather than 2
. (This frequently is the better spot.)

The 2
Response


Transfers: 2
and 2


Other Responses: 2
and higher


Map of Responder's Bids

Discussion
The most complicated module is
1
- 2
- 2
- 2
.
The tools are there, however, to find 4-4 and
4-3 major fits, determine whether to go to game, detect
weak major holdings, invite notrump games, or make slam tries with a major and a
longer minor — all without opener having to reveal
to the defenders much, if anything, about his distribution, until a fit is
found. It is arguably tedious that three rounds of bidding are necessary to
make a simple notrump invitation, but the tradeoff is worth it.
Unbalanced hands with a 5-card major and invitational values will be played in three of the major rather than in two notrump. This is not necessarily a bad thing; in fact, I never have incurred a poor result from this factor.
There is no step-response available after
1
- 2
- 2
- 3
.
That could be accommodated by swapping the structures for 5-4
reds and5-4 blacks (where there is extra space), but that would
impose a considerable memory strain, and we cannot justify it.
The system does not require the usage of South African Texas, but that method
clearly is more flexible than the standard convention, and many
4
and
4
bids aren't needed for
anything else. Sometimes responder has Kx or Kxx of a suit, and it can be
advantageous for that hand to declare.
In notrump auctions, 4
is
not Blackwood except under two conditions:
Reference to a "weak" major means an unstopped doubleton. Any three-card holding is not deemed a flaw, as the extra card reduces defensive potential in that suit.
Notes / Memory Aids
After a 2
response, any
2
by opener is natural and non-forcing.
With 4-major and 5+ minor, good hands: holding a major singleton, show the major first; with minor singleton, show the minor first.
When a pair of bids is used to "reference" other suits (not transfers), clubs and hearts always are linked, and diamonds and spades are linked.
:
3
= heart suit, 3
= spade suit.
-
2
- 2
:
3
= club suit, 3
= diamond suit.When there is a choice of singleton-showing bids: The bid always is
natural when possible. Example: after
1
- 2
-
2
: 3
and
3
include a major-suit singleton.
After 3
- 3
,
the singleton-showing calls are obvious. But after 3
- 3
, a linear progression is eschewed in favor of
keeping a call natural whenever possible: 3
= spade
singleton, 3
= heart singleton. This structure
is consistent throughout our system.
One Notrump opening bid Notrump bidding